Compare And Contrast The Writings Of Confucius, Hammurabi, And The Boo

Compare And Contrast The Writings Of Confucius, Hammurabi, And The Boo Compare and Contrast The Writings of Confucius, Hammurabi, and The Book of the Dead Three of the most famous writings from ancient civilizations are the writings of Confucius, Hammurabi's code of laws, and Egypt's Book of the Dead. At first, they seem very different, they're from different times, regions, and religions, but they all offer a peek into what values ancient people considered important. One of the values that all three civilizations is justice and fairness. I feel that this is best viewed in Hammurabi's laws. All of the penalties for the crimes are very stiff, but fair. I feel that it is fair that "If he has broken the limb of a patrician, his limb shall be broken" It's like in the Bible "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." In Egypt, in the Book of the Dead, a man couldn't proceed into the after life unless he was found innocent of any wrong doing on Earth. In Confucius' writings, he never actually says the word "justice", but he does say "Great Man cherishes excellence; Petty Man, his own comfort. Great Man cherishes the rules and regulations; Petty Man special favors." To me, that mean "Great Man is fair, Petty man is unfair." The second of these three values is responsibility and respect to one's family and elders, and responsibility and respect to others families and elders. This is most evident in Confucius' writings. He is constantly stressing family values and responsibility. One quote that shows this is "Let the sole sorry of your parents be that you might become ill." This stresses personal responsibility and respect to your parents. Hammurabi showed responsibility by saying "If a builder has built a house for a man, and has not made his work sound, and the house he built has fallen, and caused the death of the man's son, the builder's son shall be put to death." That quote shows a man's responsibility for himself and his family. In Egypt, during the ritual of the dead, it is said that the dead man, in order to pass into the afterlife, must profess that he has not done anything to hurt anyone. This shows responsibility because if the man did not tell the truth, he was responsible for not entering th e afterlife. Knowing that they would be responsible for their actions, the Egyptians tried not to hurt people in their mortal lives. The final value that all three cultures had in common was being truthful. All three cultures relied heavily on the truth. In Hammurabi's laws, it says "If a man has borne false witness in a trial, or has not established the statement that he has made, if that case be a capital trial, that man shall be put to death." In other words "If you lie, you die." When Confucius examined himself every day, he asked the question "have I been false with my friends?" In Egypt, it was important that a man be truthful when brought before Osiris, because if they didn't tell the truth, they would be banished from the afterlife. One of the lines of the Book of the Dead reads "I have not committed sin in the place of truth," which I read as "I have not lied." Each one of these three civilizations used different methods to enforce them. In Sumer, Hammurabi's strict punishments kept people from disobeying them. On the other hand, Egypt didn't use any kind of physical punishment, but they used threats. The people thought that if they went against the values, Osiris, god of the afterlife, would punish them after their died. In China, the values weren't enforced, but they were protected by the government. In the second century B.C., Confucianism became the official philosophy of China, thus preserving it for the future. I am greatly impressed by Hammurabi's ideas. His laws may sound harsh, but they had to be. In ancient Sumer, you had to be harsh or people wouldn't even listen. I don't agree, however, with his double standards. I feel that a life is worth just as much whether it's a patrician or a plebeian. I think that Confucius' ideas are the ones that come the closest to my own beliefs.

Whats a Bad SAT Score Nationally and by College

What's a Bad SAT Score Nationally and by College SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Have you taken the SAT recently? Are you wondering whether your score is bad? Or maybe you just want to know the score to beat before you take the SAT for the first time. In this article, we'll explain what a bad SAT score is, both in terms of the national averages and the colleges you might be interested in. What's Considered a "Bad" SAT Score Nationally? Looking at the 2018 SAT Total Group annual report, we see that a composite score below 1068 is below average. In terms of the sections, an Evidence-Based Reading and Writing score below 536 is below average, while a Math score below 531 is below average. This means that if you want to be above average nationally, you'll need to beat a 1068 total score. According to the2018 SAT percentiles, any composite score of 920 or lower is in the bottom 25%. In other words, if you score at or below this benchmark, your score is definitely in the low range. (Learnmore about SAT percentile rankings here.) What Do Colleges Think a Low SAT Score Is? While your national rank is important,it’s far more important to think about what your score means in terms of the colleges you want to attend. After all, you take the SAT to get admitted to colleges, so their opinion is ultimately the most important. If you’re above a college’s average SAT score range- even if your score seems low nationally- then your admissions chances won’t be compromised. Conversely, you could have a score that looks good nationally- say, in the 90th percentile (a 1340)- but is far below the ranges of selective colleges, such asthe Ivy League, Stanford, and MIT. As you can see, it'smuch more important to consider SAT scores within thecontext of your target colleges. Now let's explore some score ranges to determine what constitutes a "bad" SAT score at various colleges. What’s a Bad SAT Score for the Most Selective Schools? If you’re aiming for the most selective schools in the country- think Harvard, Stanford, Princeton, Yale, MIT- pretty much any SAT scores that aren’t considered excellent nationally are seen as low. For example, at Harvard, the SAT middle 50% ranges(i.e., the 25th to 75th percentile scores) are 730-800 for Math and 730-790 for Evidence-Based Reading and Writing. That's pretty high! Additionally, since highly competitive colleges routinely turn away applicants with scores within their average ranges, it’s safest to aim for an SAT score in the top 50% of admitted student scores- not just to be within the middle 50% range. In fact, being in the lower half of a highly selective college’s score ranges can dramatically lower your chances of admission. For example, if the school’s normal admission rate is 10% but your SAT score is in the 25thpercentile for that school, your chances of admission are really just 5% or lower. Your SAT composite score should be 1500 or higher (about 750 or higher per section) if you want to be competitive at highly selective schools. Anything below that will significantly lower your chances. Anything below 1400 (about 700 per section) is decidedly low and makes your admission more unlikely. What’s a Bad SAT Score for Selective Schools? Once you’re out of the top 15 colleges in the country, a "bad" SAT score for a school is anything below its middle 50% range. We say "bad" not because the score is necessarily bad on a national scale, but because it could lower your chances of admission. To take one example, let’s look at Boston University. BU is a selective school, ranked in the top 50 nationwide. ItsSAT middle 50% score ranges are 660-760 on Math and 640-720 onEBRW. A bad score would be anything below these section score ranges, or roughly anything lower than a 1300 SAT composite. So even though a 1300 is a strong SAT score nationally (in the top 13% of test takers!),you'd need to get at least that scoreto be competitive at BU. What constitutes a "bad" SAT score at a selective school will vary by college, so look up the ranges of schools you're interested in using our guide below. What’s a Bad SAT Score for a Local State School? If you’re looking to get into a local university or less competitive school,SAT averages are much more forgiving. For example, let’s look at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Itsmiddle 50% ranges are 510-600 for Math and 490-600 for EBRW. Therefore, for UMass Boston, a composite score around the national average of 1068 on the SAT is definitely within range for admission. In other words, there are many universities that are much more forgiving of an average or just below average SAT score. Look up your local schools below using our guide to figure out what their score ranges are. How to Find a College's SAT Score Ranges We've compiled the SAT score ranges for hundreds of colleges and universities nationwide as well as info on their average GPAs and other admissions data. To find a particular college's SAT score ranges for admission, search for "[School Name] SAT scores site:prepscholar.com": The SAT score ranges page should bethe first or second result: Click the link to get not just that school's SAT score ranges but also its average GPA and admission rate.We even have a tool that allows you to plug in your GPA and SAT/ACT scores to estimate your chance of admission. Here is what our SAT scores page for Stanford looks like: How to Avoid Getting a Bad SAT Score Now that you know what a bad SAT score looks like, what can you do to avoid getting one yourself? First, look up the middle 50% SAT ranges of all colleges you're interested in. By doing that, you can figure out the kind of SAT score you'll need to aim for to be competitive at your target schools. If you want, you can fill out the table below to track the 25th and 75th percentile SAT scores for each school you're thinking of applying to: School EBRW 25th %ile EBRW 75th %ile Math 25th %ile Math 75th %ile Composite 25th %ile Composite 75th %ile If you haven't taken the SAT yet or are planning to retake it, your target SAT score should be the upper bound of the middle 50% range of the most competitive school in your chart.As long as you make that score, you'll be competitive wherever you apply. Even if you miss it by a little bit, you'll likely be well within range for most colleges on your list. What’s Next? We’re covered what a bad SAT score might look like. So what’s a good SAT score? An excellent one? Find out here. How do you improve a low SAT score? Get expert tips for bringing up a low SAT Math score. Read our guide to getting a perfect SAT score, written by our resident full scorer. Even if you’re not aiming for a 1600, following these principles will help you reach your score goal. Not sure you can study alone? Consider using the PrepScholar SAT prep program. We take the hard part out of the studying process by analyzing your weaknesses and giving you targeted practice questions. Learn more about the SAT by reading our complete guide to the exam. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points? Check out our best-in-class online SAT prep classes. We guarantee your money back if you don't improve your SAT score by 160 points or more. Our classes are entirely online, and they're taught by SAT experts. If you liked this article, you'll love our classes. Along with expert-led classes, you'll get personalized homework with thousands of practice problems organized by individual skills so you learn most effectively. We'll also give you a step-by-step, custom program to follow so you'll never be confused about what to study next. Try it risk-free today: